Feature Requests

When I select all components and traces in the schematic, I expected the comments to be selected as well - not sure if this is a bug or feature request. Cheers

When I search for this part: C0603C105K7PAC7867 I will get pars showing up that are very close to it. It is confusing and I then need to start looking to compare part numbers. I would like a button to toggle exact match and only show the part that matches

In schematics there is a dire need to place a Text on the schematics that tells the viewer what part of the schematics they are looking at. This a. Makes it easy to cross check in between large schematics b. Easier to understand PS. Please don't mix it with the "add comment", that is a gem to have.

Make it easier to delete accounts

For big designs, the resolution of the exported PNG is too low. That causes issues when zooming in on details in the exported file.

I notice that once you add footprint(from *.MOD) to part you received all shapes from all non-signal(not copper) layers on a single layer. And it looks like everything is on the silkscreen layer right now. But this is wrong. I don't need all these lines on PCB I need only shapes from the silkscreen layer(if you open MOD file the silkscreen will be layer "21"). Yes, during PCB design I need mechanical(in KiCAD these layers are called ECO or "Engineering Change Order") layers to understand what I have between these pads, but I will not send it to a PCB manufacturer. I think we are losing information about layers, we can't separate the silkscreen layer's shapes from other layers. Also, we don't have solder mask and paste mask layers at all. https://www.loom.com/share/d33f902c38cb45b68b81aa719952eac0

Video https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ujLx0cZE3l32nmbJePOfett8rIYJQFqi/view?usp=drive_link

Would absolutely LOVE, LOVE a split view feature where I can see both schematic and PCB views side by side.

I have a complex schematic that I'd like to break down into smaller, more manageable sections. It would be great if Flux could support multi-page schematics, allowing me to divide a single schematic into multiple pages for easier navigation and organization.

When dealing with manufacturing is important to be able to know which version was manufactured. It's currently possible to use the version ID, but it'd be great if we could add human-readable names/tags to the version history.